Research Interests
Interdisciplinary systems biology research
Cellular processes are controlled by complex networks of interacting molecules. Diseases arise from disruptions in these networks and can only be undersood to a limited extent by examining individual genes or proteins. Therefore, our scientific interest is in the systemic investigation of cellular regulatory networks, especially in the field of cancer research. In our research, we combine mathematical models with high-dimensional experimental data in order to obtain insights into disease-related changes.
Quantitative analysis of cellular heterogeneity
One focus of our research is the quantitative description of cellular heterogeneity. Even genetically identical cells react differently (heterogeneously) to environmental changes. This heterogeneity is an essential feature of cellular decision-making processes and can be responsible for the diversification of tissues as well as for pathological changes. We characterize the variability of intracellular networks using time-resolved imaging methods and genomic analyzes at the single cell level. Based on this data, we develop theoretical models with which we can quantitatively map heterogeneous cell populations in the computer and thus identify the causes of cellular variability (Strasen et al., 2018; Fritzsch et al., 2018) and understand how biological systems function robustly despite fluctuations (Kamenz et al., 2015).
Systemic understanding of gene regulation
As a second focus, our group studies how the activity of genes in the cell nucleus is controlled by complex regulatory networks. We have developed systems-theoretical approaches with which we derive the interaction of the molecules in these networks from disturbance measurements and genomic ("Multi-OMICS") data sets (Braun et al., 2018; Stelniec et al., 2012; Becker et al. 2018) . The main focus of our experimental and theoretical analyzes on gene regulation is to quantitatively investigate alternative splicing. This process adds to the complexity of human cells as it enables the production of many protein variants from almost any gene. Using systems biology approaches, based on DNA and RNA sequencing data, we were able to characterize thousands of sequence mutations that influence a deregulated splicing decision in cancer cells (Braun et al., 2018). Furthermore, we have developed quantitative kinetic models to mechanistically describe the highly complex molecular machinery of alternative splicing (Sutandy et al., 2018; Enculescu et al., 2020). With such approaches we hope to gain insights into the regulatory principles of this important gene regulatory process.
Head Professor for Systems Biology - Research Group Leader
Scientific Staff
Technical Staff
PhD Students
Ausgewaehlte Publikationen
- Ebersberger S; Hipp C; Mulorz M; Buchbender A; Merzhakupova D; Kang H; Martínez-Lumbreras S; Kristofori P; Sutandy FXR; Allcca L; Schönfeld J; Bakisoglu C; Busch A; Hänel H; Welzel M; Di Liddo A; Möckel M; Zarnack K; Ebersberger I; Legewie S; Luck K; Sattler M; König J. FUBP1 is a general splicing factor facilitating 3' splice site recognition and splicing of long introns. Molecular Cell 83(15):2653-2672.e15. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.07.002
- Bohn S#, Hexemer L#, Huang Z, Strohmaier L, Lenhardt S, Legewie S*, Loewer A* (2023) State- and stimulus-specific dynamics of SMAD signaling determine fate decisions in individual cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 (10) e2210891120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2210891120
- Horn T#, Gosliga A#, Li C, Enculescu M*, Legewie S* (2023) Position-dependent effects of RNA-binding proteins in the context of co-transcriptional splicing. npj Syst Biol Appl 9, 1
- Cortés-López M#, Schulz L#, Enculescu M#, Paret C, Spiekermann B, Busch A, Orekhova A, Kielisch F, Quesnel-Vallières M, Torres-Diz M, Faber J, Barash Y, Thomas-Tikhonenko A, Zarnack K*, Legewie S*, König J* (2022) High-throughput mutagenesis identifies mutations and RNA-binding proteins controlling CD19 splicing and CART-19 therapy resistance. Nature communications 13, 5570
- Kolbe N#, Hexemer L#, Bammert LM, Loewer A, Lukáčová-Medviďová M*, Legewie S* (2022) Data-based stochastic modeling reveals sources of activity bursts in single-cell TGF-β signaling. PLoS Comput Biol 18(6): e101026
- Sarma U#, Hexemer L#, Anyaegbunam U#, Legewie S (2020) Modelling cellular signalling variability based on single-cell data: the TGFb/SMAD signaling pathway
- Enculescu M, Braun S, Setty ST, Zarnack K, König J and Legewie S (2020) Exon definition facilitates reliable control of alternative splicing. Biophysical Journal 118(8): 2027-2041
- Becker K, Bluhm A, Casas-Vilas N, Dinges N, Roignant JY, Butter F* and Legewie S* (2018). Quantifying post-transcriptional regulation in the development of D. melanogaster. Nature Communications 9: 4970
- Braun S#, Enculescu M#, Setty ST*, Cortés-López M, de Almeida BP, Sutandy FXR, Schulz L, Busch A, Seiler M, Ebersberger S, Barbosa-Morais NL, Legewie S*, König J* and Zarnack K* (2018). Decoding a cancer-relevant splicing decision in the RON proto-oncogene using high-throughput mutagenesis. Nature Communications 9: 3315
- Sutandy R#, Ebersberger S#, Huang L#, Busch A, Bach M, Kang HS, Fallmann J, Maticzka D, Backofen R, Stadler PF, Zarnack K, Sattler M, Legewie S* and König J* (2018). In vitro iCLIP-based modeling uncovers how the splicing factor U2AF65 relies on regulation by cofactors. Genome Research 28: 699-713
- Fritzsch C#, Baumgaertner S#, Kuban M, Reid G*, Legewie S* (2018). Estrogen-dependent control and cell-to-cell variability of transcriptional bursting. Molecular Systems Biology 14(2):e7678
- Strasen J #, Sarma U#, Jentsch M#, Legewie S*, Loewer A* (2018). Cell-specific responses to the cytokine TGFβ are determined by variability in protein levels. Molecular Systems Biology 14(1):e7733
- Enculescu M#, Metzendorf C#, Sparla R, Hahnel M, Bode J, Muckenthaler M*, Legewie S*. Modelling Systemic Iron Regulation during Dietary Iron Overload and Acute Inflammation: Role of Hepcidin-independent Mechanisms. PLoS Computational Biology 13:e1005322
- Kamenz J, Mihaljev T, Kubis A, Legewie S*, Hauf S* (2015). Robust ordering of anaphase events by adaptive thresholds and competing degradation pathways. Molecular Cell. 60:446 (Preview in Developmental Cell 35: 403)
- Kallenberger S, Beaudouin J, Claus J, Fischer C, Sorger PK, Legewie S*, Eils R* (2014). Intra- and Interdimeric Caspase-8 Self-Cleavage Controls Strength and Timing of CD95-Induced Apoptosis. Science Signaling 7, ra23. (Editors’ Choice in Science 343: 1178)
- Casanovas G#, Banerji A#, D’Alessio F#, Muckenthaler MU*, Legewie S* (2014). A multi-scale model of hepcidin promoter regulation reveals factors controlling systemic iron homeostasis. PLoS Comp Biol 10, e1003421
- Jeschke M, Baumgärtner S, Legewie S (2013). Determinants of cell-to-cell variability in protein kinase signaling. PLoS Comp Biol 9, e1003357
- Stelniec I#, Legewie S#, Tchernitsa O, Bobbe S, Sers C, Herzel H, Blüthgen N* and Schäfer R* (2012). Hierarchical regulation in a K-Ras-dependent transcriptional network revealed by a reverse- engineering approach. Mol Syst Biol. 2012;8:601
- Paulsen M#, Legewie S#, Eils R, Karaulanov E, Niehrs C (2011). Negative feedback in the BMP4 synexpression group governs its dynamic signaling range and canalizes development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108(25):10202-7. (Editors’Choice in Science 333: 138, Rated Exceptional by F1000)
- Legewie S, Herzel H, Westerhoff HV, Blüthgen N (2008). Recurrent design patterns in the feedback regulation of the mammalian signalling network. Molecular Systems Biology 4, 190
- Legewie S, Blüthgen N, Herzel H (2006). Mathematical Modeling Identifies Inhibitors of Apoptosis (IAPs) as Mediators of Positive Feedback and Bistability. PLoS Comput Biol. 2, e120 (Editors’Choice in Science 314: 389)
# Joint first authors
* Joint correspondence
Contact
Stefan Legewie
Prof. Dr.Director of the Department of Systems Biology
Monika Kuban
Lab Manager
Alison Gosliga
MScPhD Student, Web Administrator